logo

Clean Air News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
12/20/2007
For More Information:
Contact Matthew Davis
Organizational Development Director
207-253-1965

Alternate Contact: Emily Figdor
Federal Clean Air Advocate
202-546-9707 x307

Bush Administration Attempts to Block States’ Efforts to Improve Air Quality and Curb Global Warming Emissions

For Immediate Release: December 20, 2007

For More Information: Matthew Davis, Environment Maine, 617-529-5855

 

Bush Administration Attempts to Block States’ Efforts to Improve Air Quality and Curb Global Warming Emissions

Yesterday, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chose to ignore the science behind global warming and the Clean Air Act and bowed to political pressure from automobile industry and their friends in the White House.  In doing so, the Bush Administration is blocking state efforts to solve global warming and clean up the air for California and twelve other states.

In denying the California Clean Cars waiver, the US EPA is blocking one of the most effective tools the states have in reducing global warming pollution. While President Bush signed into law fuel economy standards today, the two policies are not comparable with regards to global warming pollution reductions by 2020. For EPA to be consistent with the Supreme Court and two Federal district courts decisions, fuel economy standards cannot be grounds for denying California’s waiver request.  The goals of a fuel economy standard and of a greenhouse gas limit for motor vehicles are different. Fuel economy standards are set by the Department of Transportation with fuel economy and oil savings in mind, not global warming emissions. The EPA, especially since the Massachusetts vs. EPA decision, should be approving motor vehicle greenhouse gas limits according to the requirements of the Clean Air Act, in order to protect the public’s health and environment. 

“The EPA is illegally shirking its responsibility and using a bait and switch to confuse the facts – fuel economy standards and the Clean Cars Program are completely different,” said Matthew Davis, Organizational Development Director for Environment Maine. “When will the Bush Administration get out of the way so that states can take action together to reduce global warming pollution?!”  

One key difference between the two policies is that the Clean Cars Program would begin with model year 2009, a full decade before the federally mandated 35 miles per gallon standard kicks in. Even when applied across the whole country, as opposed to 13 states that have adopted the Clean Cars Program, the federal standards only achieve 9 million tons more global warming reductions per year than the clean cars standard – and these reductions come a decade later. When it comes to solving global warming, time is of the essence and delaying real reductions by a decade is to deny the science behind climate change.

By denying the California global warming waiver, the EPA is illegally undermining state authority. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to grant California the waiver unless the agency carries the burden of proving those standards cannot be met. A study by the Northeast states has found that using existing technologies could meet the tailpipe global warming limits.  In the past, the EPA has granted over 50 waivers to California – this is the EPA’s first refusal. Ironically, the Bush administration has already taken credit for the California global warming emission standards in the U.S. Climate Action Report issued in July.