logo

Global Warming News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
9/20/2007
Invalid Asset URL

Maine Groups Call on Governor Baldacci to Prioritize 21st Century Transit System to Cut Pollution

For Immediate Release: September 20, 2007  

For more information:

Matthew Davis, Environment Maine Research & Policy Center, 207-253-1965

Dylan Voorhees, Natural Resources Council of Maine, 207-622-3101 ext 212, cell 802-989-3172

 

Maine Groups Call on Governor Baldacci to Prioritize 21st Century Transit System to Cut Pollution

 “Cool Moves” Report Outlines Transit’s Contribution to Curbing Global Warming Pollution

 

PORTLAND, ME- Transit use in New England reduced the region’s global warming pollution more than 1.7 million metric tons in 2005, equivalent to taking 310,000 cars off New England’s roads for the year, according to a new report, Cool Moves, released today by the Environment Maine Research & Policy Center and Natural Resources Council of Maine. Trains, buses and vanpools also saved 240 million gallons of gasoline, in addition to reducing congestion, spurring smart growth, boosting mobility and developing local economies.

 

Transportation is the leading source of carbon dioxide — the leading global warming pollutant — in New England, accounting for 40 percent of the region’s carbon dioxide emissions. Cool Moves underscores the importance of transit in solving our state’s and region’s global warming and transportation woes. And with the region facing an energy crisis, as well as rising traffic congestion and crumbling infrastructure, now is a critical turning point for our leaders to invest in a 21st century transit system.

 

“Transportation produces the lion’s share of global warming pollution, and trains, vanpools and buses are sensible ways to reduce this pollution,” said Dylan Voorhees of the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

 

According to the new report from the New England Climate Coalition, states that invested the most in transit got the largest reductions in global warming pollution and gasoline usage. Here in Maine, our state invested only $6.8 million in transit, and got small reductions in return, cutting global warming pollution by 807 tons.

 

“As the saying goes, you reap what you sow,” said Matthew Davis of the Environment Maine Research & Policy Center. “If our state is serious about tackling global warming, we need to invest more in transit.”

 

Several transit services in Maine got high marks from the report, including the Downeaster train, the GoMaine vanpools and Bangor’s BAT Community Connector bus service. Bangor invested in convenient low-floor buses and subsequently launched an effort to rebrand its service as sleek, consumer-friendly and convenient. BAT’s new buses were painted fire-engine red with a swooping bat symbol designed to capture attention. As described in a recent federal research project on transit ridership, “the result has been a revamping of previously hardened stereotypes of what public transit looks like – hip, fast, and attractive rather than dingy, smelly and old.” The approach has worked: 60 percent more trips were taken on the BAT in 2006 than had been taken five years earlier.

 

Commuter rail and other forms of rail transit (such as the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s subway and light rail networks and the Amtrak intercity rail network such as the Downeaster) accounted for most of the emission reductions from transit use. Vanpool programs, in which transit agencies provide vans for groups of commuters who use them to travel to and from work, also provided significant emission reductions relative to the small number of New England commuters currently using the services. Emissions reductions across the region, in metric tons of carbon dioxide pollution included:

  • 685,924 from commuter rail,
  • 639,898 from heavy rail (subway),
  • 241,200 from light rail,
  • 132,093 from intercity rail (Amtrak),
  • 25,188 from bus,
  • 14,866 from vanpool, and
  • 1,109 from trolleybus.

 

In order to reduce global warming emissions from cars and light trucks (such as pickups, SUVs and minivans), our state has adopted the Clean Cars Program, which will require an approximate 30 percent reduction in global warming pollution from new cars and light trucks by 2016. Over the last 25 years, the number of miles traveled on New England’s roads has increased by nearly 70 percent. Should that rate of growth continue, vehicle travel in the region would increase by another 24 percent between now and 2018, wiping out virtually all of the emission savings delivered by the Clean Cars Program.

 

“Our dependence on automobiles makes Mainers drive more and more miles each year. The good and bad news is that we haven’t even scratched the surface of creating a comprehensive, convenient, and comfortable transit system,” said Voorhees.

 

In addition to reducing global warming pollution,  transit can help promote more compact land-use patterns that allow more trips to be taken on foot or via bike while consuming less land and reducing the cost of public services. Transit also enables the rest of the transportation system to work more efficiently, cutting down on traffic congestion that wastes time, wastes fuel and causes excess pollution. Data from 2005 compiled by the Texas Transportation Institute shows that congestion has worsened in the greater Boston area, wasting more than 62 million gallons of fuel, 93 million hours of delays and $1.8 billion.

 

“Public transportation is good for the economy,” said Steven Linnell, Senior Transportation Planner with the Greater Portland Council of Governments.  “As energy costs continue to rise, using transit saves commuters serious money and expands the workforce available to employers.  Even in rural areas the multiplier effect returns $3 for every $1 invested in transit. Urban areas can see rates of return as high as 9:1.”

 

To address the region’s global warming and energy challenges, New England should invest in developing a 21st century transit system that provides convenient, affordable and comfortable transit service to more New Englanders. Our state leaders should:

·     Move aggressively to build important transit projects, many of which have been on the drawing board for years or decades. Among those projects are extending Downeaster rail service in Maine to Brunswick and Lewistion-Auburn.

·     Anticipate future needs and plan for projects that would enhance the efficiency of the state and region’s transit system, such as the Boston-Maine high speed rail corridor.

·     Boost transit ridership by maintaining and improving existing transit services, learning from innovations made by other transit agencies, such as real-time schedule information at transit stops, prioritization of transit vehicles at traffic signals, and on-board wireless Internet, thus delivering additional global warming emission reductions and energy savings.

·     Rethink its transportation spending priorities to increase the share of overall transportation funding devoted to transit, eliminate subsidies for automobile use, and develop funding mechanisms that both encourage the use of transportation alternatives and provide new revenues for improvement and expansion of transit. 

           

“If we take these sensible actions, our state will be en route to a more secure and reliable transportation system while getting on track to meet our global warming pollution reduction goals,” said Davis. 

 

###

The New England Climate Coalition is a group of over 150 state, local, regional and national environmental, public health, municipal and religious organizations dedicated to achieving global warming pollution reductions in the region.